.

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Consolidation of Power of Hitler and the Nazis - 1410 Words

The ease with which Hitler and the Nazis were able to consolidate their power by August 1934, was due to the combination of luck, manipulation of legal procedures and a willingness to be uterly ruthless. The Nazi position was extremly unstable and in shaky circumstances during January 193. However, after the events and actions taken to consolidate their power the Nazis grew stronger and became invulnerable for the time they were in power. Luck played an extremely significant role in the contribution to the Nazi consolidation of power. Hitler had been made Chancellor, however real power still eluded him. He did not have a majority in the Reichstaf and President Hindenburg had not supplied him with emergency power. The Reichstag Fire on†¦show more content†¦This gave the Cabinet a range of legislative and budgetary powers, enabling Hitler to suspend the constitution for a period of four years, with Hitler also given total power over this duration. The introduction of bringing about Gleishaltung in all areas of German life also contributed to consolidation of Nazi power. All non-Nazi organisations were either Nazified or banned. This affected German areas of life such as teaching, cultural groups, youth groups and women. For example, Nazi intrusion into aspects of life put pressure on women to stay home and become good German mother, having as many babys as possible. Also, Boy Scout groups were eliminated and replaced with Nazi Youth groups. Restrictions were also placed on where Germans could work and what was taught in schools, to the extent of being told how one should greet another in public. Anti-Jewish measures in April were also implemented, resulting in the boycott of Jewish businesses and they were dismissed from the Civil Service. In September 1933 the Reich Chamber of Culture is formed, signifying the completion of Nazi control over German culture. The Editorial Law was also passed in October, allowing Nazis total co ntrol over the media. Also contributing to the ease in which the Nazis were able to consolidate their power was the banning of all other political parties. On 14th July 1933, the Law Against the Establishment of Parties was passed. This meant that the Nazi Party was nowShow MoreRelated‘Nazi Consolidation of Power in 1933 Was Primarily Due to the Use of Terror and Violence.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?1537 Words   |  7 Pages‘Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to the use of terror and violence.’ How far do you agree with this judgement? The Nazi Party’s rise was to an extent due to the use of terror and violence, however there were limitations with this as the party was not strong enough to exert this. Their consolidation of power in 1933 was also enabled by their means of legality, and Hitler becoming Chancellor in January 1933. This rise to power was viable due to numerous factors; Hitler’s ownRead MoreNazi Consolidation of Power in 1933 Was Primarily Due to the Use of Terror and Violance. How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?1716 Words   |  7 PagesIt is to an certain extent that Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was due to the use of terror and violence. However the terror and violence was very limited because the Nazis weren’t in a strong enough position to exert terror and violence alone. Nazi propaganda against the communists made most Germans fearful of Communism therefore allowing Nazis to consolidate a bit more power through means of terror. On the other hand the Nazi partyâ⠂¬â„¢s policy of legality and the threat of communism are to aRead MoreConsolidation of Nazi Power 1933-1934 Essay1228 Words   |  5 PagesAccount for the initial consolidation of Nazi power in 1933 - 1934 Due to the failure of the Weimar Republic and general public dissatisfaction arising from poor economic conditions exacerbated by the Treaty of Versailles, coupled with the 1929 Wall Street Crash, German citizens were understandably desperate for change. Until this point in time the Nazi party, and Hitler, had been essentially unpopular. However, the economic situation ensured Hitler’s increasing popularity as the people lookedRead MoreConsolidation of Nazi Power773 Words   |  4 PagesNazi Consolidation of Power 1933-34 The consolidation of power by the Nazi’s was absolute and effective in the years 1933-34 in Germany. Hitler used a range of events such as the Reichstag fire and Hindenburg’s death to act as a catalyst to achieve his final goal, as the undisputed Fuhrer, by august of 1934. Also the passing of certain laws such â€Å"the protection of People and State Act† and the â€Å"Enabling act† gave the Nazi’s further power to consolidate their position as the only party in GermanyRead MoreHow did Nazi Propoganda Help Hitler Condolidate Power1397 Words   |  6 Pagesdid Nazi propaganda help Hitler consolidate power in Germany (1933-1938)? To determine the extent to which Nazi propaganda was the key in Hitler’s consolidation of power, this report will identify the key factors that helped Hitler consolidate power and adjudge how big of a factor propaganda was in comparison to the others. Consequently, the report will include of a conclusive statement to answer the research question to whether or not Propaganda was a major factor to Hitler’s consolidation ofRead MoreHow Far Do You Agree That Hitler’s Consolidation of Power Between January 1933 and August 1934 Can Be Described as a â€Å"Legal Revolution†770 Words   |  4 PagesHitler’s consolidation of power between January 1933 and August 1934 can be described as a â€Å"legal revolution† It is to a certain extent that Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was due to the use of terror and violence. However the terror and violence was very limited because the Nazis weren’t in a strong enough position to exert terror and violence alone. Nazi propaganda against the communists made most Germans fearful of Communism therefore allowing Nazis to consolidate a bit more power throughRead MoreHitler Misconception Concerning The Causes Of Germanys894 Words   |  4 PagesHitler misconception concerning the causes of Germanys collapse in WWI greatly influenced his evil decisions as warlord. His beliefs that Germany would not have been defeated had the war continued had no basis in reality. The German cause was lost. The ‘lessons’ he learned from WWI were all the wrong ones. What he always called the â€Å"stab in the back† was no such thing, which makes him a liar. When Germany surrendered, it was for the purely pragmatic reason of survival. Why allow yo ur enemies to occupyRead MoreThe Treaty of Versailles Essay644 Words   |  3 Pagesgave rise to fascism in Germany. The factors that led to the growth of Hitler were the treaty of Versailles ,the economic downfall ,and widespread hatred towards social democracy. Hitler saw the opportunity and started accusing the people who signed the Hitler focused on honouring the state,nationalism and millatarism.hitler was able to see the opportunity and Raise of hitler ideology of fascismse-furthermore fascist administration was implementedRead MoreThe Establishment of Hitlers Dictatorship and Its Legality Essay900 Words   |  4 PagesThe Establishment of Hitlers Dictatorship and Its Legality The career of Adolf Hitler was marked by a spectacular rise to power. He went from being a nobody in the streets of Vienna to the supreme leader of one of the most powerful nations on earth. Hitler came to power through a combination of legal means and backroom politics. The events leading up to the rise of the Nazis and Hitler are prime examples of the myriad of factors intertwining in the area of social actionRead MoreHitler s Theory Of Social Darwinism And State Authority982 Words   |  4 PagesThe Nazi regime reflected an amorphous, chaotic structure of vaguely defined departments and offices that were â€Å"each narrowly confined by Hitler to their own specialist spheres.† Under Hitler’s institutional doctrine of social Darwinism and lack of administrative intervention, he was able to pit departments and individuals against each other in a symbiotic yet disorganized alliance of extreme radicalization and state authority. Hitler’s position as the stable consolidated head of the Nazi state

No comments:

Post a Comment