Canterbury Tales Essay - Wife of Bath as an Attack on Married Life?

Canterbury Tales - wife of Bath is Not an Attack on Women and Married Life Feminists have proposed that the Prologue of the married woman of Bath is merely an attack on women and married invigoration. The Prologue is spoken by a woman with strong opinions on how married life should be conducted, only is written by a man. It is important to examine the purpose with which Chaucer wrote it. This is especially so as many of the pilgrims in The Canterbury Tales condemn themselves out of their own mouths, such(prenominal) as the Monk and the Friar. While the Wife spends most of the Prologue arguing in favour of the deceit and deviousness that wise wives will execute, the argument is often mixed-up and can approach ridiculousness in its vehemence. Are we to agree with the views that the Wife of Bath puts forward so strongly, or does Chaucer present her as a caricature of every negative quality women are traditionally guilty of? A great deal of the Wifes Prologue is spent in her narrati on of the tirades that she subjected her first three husbands to, more often than not a list of accusations made by anti-feminists of women, and the Wifes spirited responses. The Wifes replies defend womens behaviour -- if a husband has enough sex from his wife, she says, he should not care How mirily that othere folk fare. She attacks scholars who accuse women of all manner of vileness by asking Who peynted the leon, tel me who? and that because scholars (Mercurie) and women (Venus) are diametrically opposed, Therfore no womman of no clerk is preysed. However, while it is clear that the Wife is on the side of fellow females, in a logical sense the Wifes arguments are not particularly effective against the anti-feminists view that women are as vain as cats, as sex... ...ties of lechery and unscrupulousness that is why Chaucer writes about her. By allowing both her and Jankyn bliss when he finally surrenders power to his wife, Chaucer does not appear to disapprove of this state o f affairs on principle. The Wife of Bath is, however, a psychological study of a powerful, sexual woman and a speculation on what such a womans life might be like. It is clearly one that intrigued Chaucer, as can be seen from the length of the prologue, which dwarfs all the others by comparison. Chaucers aim in writing this prologue appears to have been the manifestation of a character so strong, she approached a force of nature, rather than an attack on women and their conduct in married life. Work CitedChaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed Mack, Maynard et al. W. W. Norton and Co. unseasoned York, NY. 1992.