Discussing Bresslers definition of Marxism as a literary theory :: essays papers

Discussing Bresslers definition of Marxism as a literary theory Marxism is not the hot topic it once was. With the collapse of communist U.S.S.R., mainstream North America had thought it had seen the last of Marxism and the communist party. However, with the Peoples Republic of chinaware becoming a reality, those early beliefs may have proven to be premature.Defining Marxism is not difficult. Marxism is the belief that the common workingman (the proletariat) is under a sway of tyranny by the upper class owners (the materialistic.) Someday (according to Marx) the proletariats will train up, overthrow the bourgeois and create a society of communism. Communism is the semipolitical idea in where a society would be controlled mostly by the government. Personal property would not be allowed and therefore eliminate the bourgeois a utopian society in which every man plant for the common good.Marxists believe that (based on the works of Karl H. Marx) everything we do or hold is fixd by the bourgeois. This is honest. Marxism becomes difficult when defining it as a literary theory. The superior intentions of Marx were those of social and political revolution. Many of Marxs followers however, were and are scholars. Therefore the diversity from a social economic theory to a school of literary criticism was inevitable. Charles Bressler is faced with this seeming difficult task of defining Marxism as a literary school of thought.Bressler attempts to define and explain Marxism as a school of literary thought by examining past Marxists, the assumptions which one moldiness adopt and the methodology (as he does with every chapter.) He succeeds in few places and fails in others. Bresslers definition of Marxism is as follows, the belief that reality itself thunder mug be can be defined and understood, society shapes our consciousness, social and economic conditions directly influence how and what we believe and value, and Marxism details a plan for changing t he world from a place of bigotry, hatred and conflict due to class struggle to a classless society where wealth, opportunity, and education are accessible for all stack. Bressler does a decent job here. He defines Marxism as it was originally mean an economic and social view of culture and its influences. He provides a clear, simple definition of Marxism which is easily understandable.After this however, Bresslers chapter begins to fall apart. He succeeds in self-aggrandizing a brief description of Marxist events and theorists, but fails in his assumptions and methodology.