Thursday, January 24, 2019
Summary and Response to What Shamu
She tries he usual ways to change him, such(prenominal) as counseling and a lot of nagging, but she soon resigns herself to the item that these tactics are not going to work. While on a trip to California to research a school for exotic wildcat trainers, Sutherland studied the techniques students were using, such as approximation rewarding the small step toward learning a whole new behavior, least reinforcing syndrome not responding in any way to bad behavior, and incompatible behaviors a behavior that makes the hateful behavior impossible. Soon she realized that these same quenches may very sound work on her husband.After years of secretly training her husband with these techniques, she is cheery to tell readers that his behavior and their marriage are both much improved. I have a go at ited reading Sutherland essay for the humor she uses in her writing. I particularly enjoy the way she refers to her husband as the American husband and my animal, as if he is some other specie s in need of training in order to make a good pet. I must give up that even though I found the humor in this read, I found the whole idea of training your husband as you chintzy an animal to be complete nonsense. Did she write this piece as a joke? Retainer hope so, because if she meant for it to be serious and she actually well-tried this training on her husband, she has entirely too much time on her hands. Sutherland says l began thanking Scott if he threw one dirty shirt into the hamper. If he threw in two, Id kiss him. Meanwhile, I would Step oer any soiled clothe on the floor without one sharp word, though did sometimes discontinue them under the bed. But as he basked in my appreciation, the piles became little (251 I have a suggestion for you Mrs.. Sutherland, how bout you just ask, or tell if you have to, your husband to pick up his vestments.If he lighten doesnt honor your wishes, throw his clothes away each time you invent them on the floor. This type obtaining usu ally works well. Call it the toss clothes method. No need for approximations here. If you would like to cook dinner without him hovering over you, how about you just tell him so. If this doesnt work, stop cooking him dinner. Would bet he figures out real quick that he shouldnt hover over you any more(prenominal). This is referred to as the no din-din technique. Who needs incompatible behaviors anyway? One more IP for you Mrs..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment