.

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Character Analysis of Thomas Gradrind in the Hard Times Essay

doubting Thomas Gradrind is the depression character presented in the book strenuous Times by Charles Dickens. He is cardinal of the underlying figures through whom the author weaves a web of intricately connected characters and plotlines. The master(prenominal) central features of his character be his monotone attitude and appearance that is mechanized. Mr. Gradrinds opening speech to a group of young students during the opening blastoff embodies his dryness and the hard fact that he impounds in his students heads.            Gradrind is best described physically as an obstinate carriage, neat coat, square legs, square shoulders by the narrator, which is suggestive of Gradrinds unrelenting rigidity (Dickens, 2001, p.47). During the first few chapters, Gradrind expounds his ism of calculating his rational self interest. He believes that pitying nature crowd out be governed by complete rational rules. He is also restore to weigh and measure any parcel of humans nature and be able to tell what it comes to. He animateds by a joyless, pure memorization address to statement and carriage.  In the refreshed, his dull fire regarding education is sh stimulateNow, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nada but Facts. Facts completely      are wanted in animateness. Plant nothing else, and root fall out ever soything else. You can only form the minds of occasioning animals upon Facts nothing else will ever be of any service to        them. This is the principle on which I add together up my own children, and this is the   principle on which I bring up these children.  Stick to Facts, sir (Dickens, 2001 p.47)By this philosophy, he was able to triumph financially and socially. level off his agency of living as a hardware merchant is an hint of his fixation on hard material truth. He also became a member of the Parliament and this position allowed him to indulge his interest tabulating data around people from England. Though he is not a factory owner, he evinces the spirit of Industrial Revolution as he treats people inter transformable a machine that can be reduced to a frame of principles of science.            Although it seems that the narrators description of Gradrind seems depressing, the latter also undergoes significant transplant in the novel which later catches the narrators sympathy. This is when Louisa confessed to Gadrind that something really grievous is missing in her life and that she is unhappy about marrying Bounderby. This makes Gradrind realize that the education system that he has is not perfect.This is also proven when he well-read that Tom, his son, robbed the bank of Bounderby. After Gradrind realizes his failures, he admits to himself that he is really sorry for relying in any case much on facts. The dilemmas of his children make him feel and learn love, compassion and sorrow. He later becomes a humble man and making his facts and figures in greater connection with the virtues of faith, hope and charity.            Throughout the book, Thomas Gradrind was a man who clings to facts and statistical objects as the only truth. He believes that these are the in-chief(postnominal) things that should be dealt with in order to achieve a healthy productive life. This makes him somewhat closed-minded since he solely sticks to his own vision of truth about life. He can be quoted as a perfectionist who strives to make his children perfect and brocaded them with perfection. Ironically, his children cannot absorb all that he was feeding.            Thomas Gradrind lives in a reality where he al sorts depends on meanings and reckonings. This trait of his was shown in his dialogues such as thisHerein lay the spring of the mechanical art and myste ry of educating the reason without stooping to the cultivation of the sentiments and affections. Never wonder.  By means of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, settle everything someways and never wonder (Dickens, 2001 p.89)This implies that he has a scientific and mathematical approach to life.            After being a prominent citizen of Coketown he later becomes one of the Parliament members. This gives him a chance to implement a one-sided matter-of-fact philosophy on local schools. He is often viewed as rationalist, egoistical and cold. In raising and teaching children like Louisa, Tom, Jane, Adam, and Malthus, he sees to it that they are as practical. They are also always forbidden to nurture emotions and fill their minds with imaginations. He also views love and forbearance as a means of adjust facts and figures. Not until Louisa runs to him in full distress of the impending misfortune when she marries Boun derby that he realizes the limitations of his philosophical notions about hard facts.Despite his stubbornness and fixation on logic, Gradrind is a great father to his children. He raised his kids well because he always wanted the best for them. He does things which he thinks will attain their individuality. Thus, after hearing Louisas troubles, he makes it a point to change himself and support her in her agony. For his children, he learned to repent for his wrongdoing and became ready to change his ways that caused his childrens unhappiness.            The main conviction of Gradrind in the floor is his utilitarian point of view regarding facts and figures. Being a man of facts and figures, utilitarianism is manifested in his view of every individual. Rather than see people as a unique person, he develops a gen epochl view of people, which focuses on their productiveness and usefulness in the society as a whole. He feels that everything in life can be measured through universal calculation and tabulations. Everything can be computed, from interior designing to marriage.            Further analysis of Gradrinds character suggests that he also mirrors the way people think during the era of industrialization. Charles Dickens wanted to explain to his readers the ideals and disadvantages of industrialization. Thomas Gradrind is an embodiment of how an individual embraces the beliefs and practices of industrialization. The way factory owners think during the time of industrialization is shown in the character of Gradrind. They are only after the monetary gain rather than the individual expense of the workers.  Dickens created an enduring tale that reflects the issues of an era filled with historical transformation.            The philosophy of utilitarianism and its connection to industrialization is given enough meaning through Thomas Gradrinds character. After practicing the fact philosophy, his daughter Louisa made him realize that something is more important than the lessons of facts and figures. Before the novel ends, she ends up confessing to her father that there seems to be nothing here but languid and monotonous smoke (Dickens, 2001, p.78). She complains how mechanized the way her father raised her that brought her such misery.            It is in the near end of the novel that Gradrind realizes and sees his errors. He feels sorry for the way his children suffered his ideological principle. For the first time he did not dwell on facts and figures and humbly felt sorry for what he did, Dickens used Gradrind to tell readers how to understand that there is more to life than facts and figures. He wanted to use Gradrinds character to show that everyone can change even the industrialized society during that time.Thomas Gradrind can be viewed by readers as chara cter of change. He changed his philosophical ideals in moorage of something more importanthis familys happiness. Each individual has his or her own set of principles. Although it is worth sharing with some others, it should not be shared to the finish of imposing it to others to follow. It should also not be used to manipulate other people. Gradrind can be an eye opener for many people who live under the influence of abusive power and authority. Louisas case made a turning point on her fathers life and paved the way for a better life for his children.Work CitedDickens, Charles. Hard Times. Norton Critical Edition 3rd Ed. 2001.

No comments:

Post a Comment