'America Foreign Policy\r'

'The barter ban fit(p) by the fall in tells on Cuba involves fiscal, stinting and commercial restrictions that were com manpowercement ceremony placed on Fidel Castro’s governance in 1962. It was as a extend of the politics expropriation of assets and properties of US nationals and corporations. The merchandise stoppage was premier(prenominal) suggested and implemented by president Kennedy’s brass on the charge that thither was deficiency of body politic in Cuba non barely when in respect to the Cuban nationals precisely as well as to different nationals.In essence, the embargo restricted certain economic and financial transactions amongst the nationals of the both countries whether presently or in awfulctly in check to the use of goods and services of a third agricultural or national of much(prenominal) a pastoral. The embargo started with the introduction of an result quota on scrape imported from Cuba by any(prenominal)(prenominal ) millions. This was met by an agreement by the Soviet Union to by the rest of the sugar from Cuba. Still, the Cuban administration under the leaders of Fidel Castro continued to take further actions on businesses owned by Ameri place national, confiscating c turn a loss to of it.The US judicature retaliated by blasting the passel restrictions even further especially because of the fusion of Cuba with the Soviet Union in the arctic war which caused the Cuban missile crisis. Later, the US policy-making relation obligate travel restrictions to its nationals curb them from traveling to Cuba. Further down the line, the US regime charged the Cuban government of hosting Soviet Union nuclear weapons and since the nub was an enemy in the cold war, regulations were rig in place to drop by the waysideze each Cuban assets in the states and to further consolidate the restrictions typeset on the country.Various restrictions has since been put in place which include restriction o n the marrow of money spent by a US national on the Cuban island, restrictions on the forms and inwardness of gifts that a US national evoke render to a relative in Cuba or a Cuban national among a nonher(prenominal)s. Furthermore, the US government restricted any go with that is affect in flock activities in Cuba from entering the US providence on the argument that much(prenominal) a go with would be trafficking assets from US to Cuba. To date, roughly of the guile restrictions placed on Cuba and expenditure restrictions placed on US nationals and corporations still stand.Despite efforts by some of the activists and linked Nations has been meeting a dead end with previous and ongoing presidents of the US suspending bills and efforts aimed at scratching the embargo. Despite the situation that some valid cogitates were used in basing the embargo and the incident that the US government and its nationals ar non touched overmuch by the Embargo, the effectuate of i t be non only touch the unintended scarce similarly affecting the US thriftiness in ways which were unintended. Efforts by activists and the UN are still unsuccessful despite the dire consequences that the embargo has had.In essence, magic spell today the embargo is much founded on country issues in Cuba, it goes a step further to obligate the achievement of nation in the country, operose Cuban citizens as contrary to the Administration. The answer of the paper is to expound on the upbeats that tummy be achieved by cabbageing the embargo non only to Cuba further overly to the US and its citizens in general. Why the Embargo should be elevate As observed earlier, dissimilar efforts to lift the restrictions on Cuba and American travelers study continuously been rejected twain(prenominal) by the President and the congress.On the contrary, the US government has relieved a little followers nip from some of the activists. For example, agribusiness presidency s and American farmers put the government under pressure to lift some of the restrictions which saw the allowance of exchange of medicine and agricultural fairs only for tender-heartedist reasons. Still, many of the restrictions still are in place and in that respect exist no evidence that these restrictions pass on be lifted any time soon. In illumination with the embargo, Cubans and scholars piss begd that the embargo has and still is affecting negatively the resources of the Cuban nationals as remote to those of the government.This raises many human-centered issues in project to the US government especially considering that the embargo was as a result of democracy issues in Cuba. It has been contestd and it is true to a greater extent that the economic damage that arises as a result of the embargo is to some extent responsible for the jobs associated with fascinateation and nutrient paucity in Cuba. As argued by some governments and activist, the embargo has had dire effects on medicine supplies, food and separate economic needs of Cubans.This by generation has resulted in vulnerability in septic diseases and epidemics including malnutrition. The restrictions alike develop negatively moved(p) the flow of medical info in the country and then resulting to diseases that would new(prenominal)wise be easily dealt with. The rationing system that results as a result of food shortage have greatly stirred men and the elderly since designed to hold in sense of taste to women and children. On an separate view, the embargo has greatly influenced the capacity of US investors in Cuba yet more so have affected non American investors in Cuba.In this context, investors who have interests in the US thriftiness have been reluctant or have been restricted by the natural law from investing in Cuba. As such, the embargo is not only affecting the Cuban and the American nationals but also the nationals of separate countries as well. Moreover, it has continuously threaten diplomaticalal relationship of US and new(prenominal) countries in regard to the dealings and transactions of these countries and Cuba. In any case, patch the embargo gives the Cuban government a scapegoat for problems not institutionalizely associated with the embargo, it gives a foreland start for non US businesses in Cuba should it be lifted.In this regard, these businesses have already established unanimous foundations to be shaken by the aspiration that would arise from the lifting of the muckle embargo. In general, while the embargo is aimed at meliorate the democracy and the compliance with human rights, it has continuously affected these rights negatively making it non humanitarian itself. It is charge noting that it an inadequate reason for the US government to argue that it is involved in good- pull up stakes do aimed at giving medical and food supplies to Cubans.On the new(prenominal) hand, the bureaucracy involved in this benignity w ork has greatly affected its effectiveness in Cuba. kindliness organizations and other non governmental organizations have face delays as a result of the licensing subroutine involved and transportation problems. It also hold still for a violation of international law as provided for by the get together Nations Charter. In this context, the fact that the embargo directly condemns the sales agreement of certain food products and medical products abuses the human right of accessing life saving medical supplies.Further Arguments As it stands out, the wiliness embargo imposed by US government hinders idle championship amid the 2 countries. plot of land the US government is passing drug-addicted on home toil, it does not esteem that it has a comparative emolument on all it consumables thus it is forced to import some of it consumables from other countries. This implies that there is an organism of vacate trade between US and these other countries. One of the major advan tages of let off trade is that it promotes liberalization of the economies involved.As such, by maintaining the trade embargo on Cuba, the US is denying the Cuban economy better grounds for liberalization. In essence, the Cuban economy can not be pass to American investors nor is it open to non US investors who have interests in both countries. In this context, the US economy is and continues to lose the advantages that are associated with the liberalization of the Cuban economy just kindred any other economy. In fact, it would be irrational to argue that the economy of Cuba has little to offer to that of US.On the other hand, Cuba has been famous of having a comparative advantage on sugar payoff. It is imperative that the US economy can obtain such goods from other economies but the question remain, how bald-faced would it attain them from the Cuban economy. A good example is the tourist potential of Cuba. go severeness restrictions have greatly affected the realization of benefits in Cuban tourist diligence as the US government restricts its nationals in visiting the island and in the maximum amount of dollars that can be spent on the island on any apt(p) day.Moreover, palliate trade allows the manifestation and improvement of diplomatic relationship between the countries involved. While the problem in Cuba is a political one, trade embargo does not servicing in solving other problems in the country especially social and humanitarian’s one. It has over and over been argued that as opposed to a trade embargo, the problems in Cuba can only be solved by changing the communist political organization in the country. In erupt with these, the US government should first lift the embargo then embark on measures that are aimed at filling the loopholes in the Cuban political system.In any case, the embargo like others placed on other countries such as Iraq will only give the Cuban administration a reason to cling further to it political system. Wh ile, the US government restrict the provision of certain services to Cubans as was evident in the situation where the US government distressed Starwood hotels to chase away Cuban portion who had attended the US- Cuba Trade Association, the Cuban government is also justified to retaliate in any way they think will bring twinity. Such retaliation will only worsen further the diplomatic relationship between the two countries.Still, free trade helps in change magnitude the amount of alien currentness held by a given economy. With the reduction of economic assistant by the soviet, Cuba has been experiencing may economic problems just about of which is as a result of lack of foreign currency to service debts secured from Asian countries. As a result, the bread and butter precedents of Cuban nationals have greatly depreciated. In this context, it is a fallacy for the US government to argue that all the humanitarian problems in Cuba are as a result of bad governance.In essence, the US governments and it allies whether countries, corporations or individuals have greatly contributed to the decline in humanitarian welfare in Cuba. By placing sanctions on allies dealing with Cuba and by conclusion it economy from Cuba, the US government denies Cuba a chance to earn foreign currency and by extension impacts heavily on the livelihood of Cubans. Perhaps the most writ large advantage of free trade is that it cast ups the keep standard of the nationals of the two respective economies.In this regard, free trade increases the availability of a variation of goods and services to the populations of the two countries. For one, the population has a variety of quality products to choose from and secondly, these products are available at a cheaper expense keeping in mind the judgment of comparative advantage. Buying these products a cheaper charge will increase the real buying power of the constituents of the population giving them the content to save and invest in o ther areas of the economy.It would therefore be worthy to the Cuban nationals if the US government lifts the embargo as this will help in not only cut their dependence on other economies through generosity whole caboodle but it would also improve their sprightliness standards. Since the US government and economy is highly involved in charity work to help Cubans, the lifting of the ban would also go a long way in helping the economy to develop given the nature and the follow of the resources used for charity work. Another advantage of free trade is that it helps in improving the infrastructure of both countries and this is inclusive of both transport and communication.While the US trade embargo on Cuba can be seen as restricting the movements of goods and services, restrictions have been put in place which restricts the docking of Cuban ships on American docks. Similarly, there have been travel restrictions especially in regard to US citizens. In light with the restrictions and with the poor diplomatic relationship between the two countries, the infrastructures of the two countries have suffered though not in direct terms. For example, flights operate between the two countries have been rerouted as no of the country want the other to intrude in her air space.Situations as these have increased the cost of transport between the two countries and have even hindered the movement of goods and services especially for Cuba since it has to use long routes to import goods thus a high cost of importation. Such a poor infrastructure has also been impeach of harboring poor flow of medical information into Cuba and by extension increasing the doggedness of epidemics and diseases in the country. Free trade encourages the increase in the level of enthronisation funds opportunities between the respective countries while at the equivalent time increasing foreign direct enthronements.This on the other hand helps in raising the living standards of the population of th e two countries. Should the government lift the trade embargo, investment opportunities will sprout in the two countries. As a result, even if the US does not directly participate in investing in the Cuban economy, other multinational companies will try on investment opportunities in the country. In essence, those allies of US who have been reluctant to invest in the country will reconsider their stand. Moreover, the multinational companies in Cuba will also seek investment opportunities not only in the American economy but also in the economies of its allies.This will earn foreign currency for all the participating countries but more so will help in raising the living standards of Cuban nationals. As evidence has shown, the confiscation of Cuban assets including money held in banks, the government is only further aggregating the problem as the Cuban government is bound to take equal measures of counter attack and this can only add up to a nett of tit for tat game. In appendix t o the above, free trade is also consequential in that it helps in increasing practice session opportunities in the respective countries.As is the case with the living standards, creation of employment opportunities is integrated with other factors such investment and specialization. As say earlier, free trade creates investment opportunities which by extension create employment opportunities while at the same time improving the living standards of the nationals. In addition, free trade increases the economies of scale which means more investment and earnings from the existing investments. This will also help in creating employment opportunities for the citizens of the two countries.In this light, it would be more advantages if the US government considers the probability of lifting the embargo as this would benefit not only the economy of Cuba but also its own economy. It would help in raising the living standards of Cubans thus reducing the level of poverty and dependence in the country. Finally, free trade helps in the harmonisation of prod policies between the two countries thus offering cheap and affordable labor term. On top of this, free trade allows increased mobility of factors of production.As stated earlier, the fact that the US economy is capable in producing most of its consumables does not necessarily mean that it has a comparative advantage in production of all of them. If the embargo is lifted, the US economy will be able to expand its base in relation to factors of production thus improving on the productivity of its economy. With the advantage arising from the geographical positions of the two countries, the US economy is capable of importing factors of production from Cuba at a lower cost and in time thus increasing productivity in its industries.Goods can also be exported to Cuba not just for charity work but also for earning foreign currency. Conclusion As is evident following the above discussion, it is evident that the US by placing t he embargo on Cuba, the US government has denied the Cuban economy to grow and by extension, it has denied Cubans the opportunity of enjoying a high standard of living. While the argument still stay that the embargo is aimed at improving the democracy in Cuba, it should be known to the US government that this has only resulted to more humanitarian problems than there was before the embargo.It is therefore eventful for the US government to accept the fact that what is needed in Cuba as opposed to trade embargos is to change the whole political system. As such, the US government should lift the ban and look for other economic and political ways of influencing Cuba. Reference: Arnson Cynthia, 1993. joint: Congress, the President and Central America, 1976-1993. Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 17 Bhaqwati Jaqdish, 2002. Free Trade Today. United States, Princeton University Press, pp.34 Fawn Rick, 2003. Ideology and National identity in Post Communist strange P olicies. London, Frank Cass, pp. 32 Gianaris Nicholas, 1998. The northernern American Free Trade Agreement and the European Union. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 23 Louis A. 1995. Essays on Cuban History: Historiography and Research. Florida, University Presses of Florida, pp. 45 McGillion Chris, 2002. Unfinished rail line: America and Cuba after the Cold War, 1989-2001. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 19 Pierce Anne, 2004.The American Foreign constitution Tradition: Inspiration for Troubled Times. universe of discourse and I, Vol. 19, pp. 56 Showalter D. 2007. Debating Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Foreign Policies, 1933- 1945. The Historian, Vol. 69, pp. 87 Ted Hopf, 2002. Social Construction of International governance: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press, pp. 90 William M. 1998. Our Own Backyard: The United States in Central America, 1977-1992. United States, University of North Carolina Press, pp. 41\r\n'