Case Study (revenue Law)

Running head : CASE STUDYRevenue LawNameCourseUniversityTutorDateThe issue in this issuance is whether the substantiation that David genuine is taxable , during which year of tax and by what direct . The cheque he received was for refreshful resign modification from his former Australian employerIn the year that David received the brisk b revise cheque , he had already resigned and left(p) for the States as we are told that that the opportunity was in early 2006It is blank to as heart and soule that the refreshing forego allowance cheque that he received is for the appropriate that he did not scoop up when he was let off employment back in AustraliaThe lawAccording to prick 26AC of the Income tax Assessment Act (Australian which deals with lump sum up fee of one-year result allowance that is not taken , it s tates that the bracing appropriate allowance is taxable with the former(a) sources of incomeThis is the case irrespective of the boundary period that the initial actual leave allowance is accruingThe Income childbed Act statesSection 26 AC (1 . This section applies to all summation remunerative afterwardwards 15 August 1978 (whether voluntarily by agreement or by compulsion of law to a tax payer in a lump sum in consequence of the retirement of the tax payer after the date from whatever office or employment or in consequence of the termination that after that date of any office or employment of the taxpayer , being an amount that is stipendiary in respect of unused annual leave or in respect of unused annual leave and a bonus .

Loading or different additional defrayal relating to that leaveIn the above provision of the Act (sec 26AC (1 , annual leave histrion any leave taken to be annual leave , enjoyment leave or holidays being leave to which a person has an entitlement by law of the country resulting from employment or the contract agreements to an officeThe applicationIn this case , the above law applies to David in that it relates to the unused leave allowance that relates to the employment when he was in AustraliaSome of the other issues that could arise are to do with the residence year of income and whether he should be taxed at the normal tax revenue rate (using occupier or non occupier ratesIssue of residenceDavid is still a occupant of Australia since they be after to reside in the USA for besides 4 days and that is the period that his wife is contractedSince he is still a resident , he pull up bet be ta xed at the resident taxation rates , which in 1978 were 5 of all the unused leave allowanceYear of incomeThe year of income is of the essence(p) in this case in that the allowance was for the year of income 2006 . David received the cheque in 2007This fact will enable us to determine the tax on the allowance using the normal rate (2006 ) and it will be taxed together with the other incomes of 2006Taxation...If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper